<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="In this article, two of the world's top technology companies face off. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) — better known by its popular subsidiary, Google — dominates search and advertising throughout the world. Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is one of the leading e-tailers in all of Asia, particularly in China.” data-reactid=”11″>In this article, two of the world’s top technology companies face off. Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) — better known by its popular subsidiary, Google — dominates search and advertising throughout the world. Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is one of the leading e-tailers in all of Asia, particularly in China.
Both of these companies have been solid investments, each doubling over the past five years — while the broader market is up 44% in the same time frame. But between the two, which is a better buy today?
Image source: Getty Images.
Obviously, I can offer no guarantees. But if we compare these companies on three important criteria, we can get a better idea which one you might be more comfortable putting your money behind today.
<h2 class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Financial fortitude” data-reactid=”26″>Financial fortitude
Financial fortitude means that when a crisis hits, you not only survive, but you can grow stronger. If you have lots of cash and strong cash flows when all of your competitors are struggling during a recession, you can grow stronger in the long run. This can take many forms: acquiring distressed rivals, grabbing market share with lower prices, or simply buying back your own shares.
Keeping in mind that Alphabet is valued 80% higher (by market cap) than Alibaba, here’s how the two stack up.
Company | Cash | Debt | Free Cash Flow |
Alphabet | $123 billion | $4 billion | $23 billion |
Alibaba | $64 billion | $17 billion | $12 billion |
Data source: Yahoo! Finance. Cash includes long and short-term investments. Free cash flow presented on trailing 12-month basis.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="One thing is clear: Both companies have very healthy balance sheets. While I’m going to give my nod to Alphabet here — the company has far more flexibility in a downturn given its $120 billion net cash position — don’t take it as a serious knock against Alibaba. It, too, would fare well given its war chest and healthy cash flows.” data-reactid=”32″>One thing is clear: Both companies have very healthy balance sheets. While I’m going to give my nod to Alphabet here — the company has far more flexibility in a downturn given its $120 billion net cash position — don’t take it as a serious knock against Alibaba. It, too, would fare well given its war chest and healthy cash flows.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Winner = Alphabet” data-reactid=”33″>Winner = Alphabet
<h2 class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Valuation” data-reactid=”34″>Valuation
Next we have valuation. It can be very tricky to try to pin down which stock is “cheaper” or “more expensive.” As such, I like to use a wide range of metrics to build a more accurate picture.
Company | P/E | P/FCF | P/S | PEG Ratio |
Alphabet | 28 | 37 | 6.3 | 1.9 |
Alibaba | 35 | 39 | 9.4 | 1.0 |
Data source: Yahoo! Finance, E*Trade, Gurufocus.com.
Neither one of these companies is in “screaming buy” territory, but neither looks abjectly expensive, either. Alphabet’s price appears cheaper on the basis of earnings, free cash flow, and sales. But when we consider growth prospects, Alibaba actually appears to be trading at a significant discount compared with Alphabet.
Given the lack of a clear indication as to which is cheaper — and the fact that the earnings and free cash flow ratios are so close — I’m calling this one a draw.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Winner = Tie” data-reactid=”41″>Winner = Tie
<h2 class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Sustainable competitive advantages” data-reactid=”42″>Sustainable competitive advantages
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Finally, we have what I consider to be the most important aspect of an investment: the sustainable competitive advantages — otherwise known as a moat.” data-reactid=”43″>Finally, we have what I consider to be the most important aspect of an investment: the sustainable competitive advantages — otherwise known as a moat.
Alphabet benefits from several moats, but low-cost production is foremost among them. “What does the company produce at such low cost?” you might ask. The answer: data. Google has eight different products with over 1 billion active users (search, GMail, maps, Chrome, Android, YouTube, Play Store, and Drive). Most of those products are free to use and require little investment once they become that popular. Google can turn around and offer that data to advertisers that want placement in front of the right eyeballs at the right time.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="It's true that Amazon.com has recently started eating into Google’s advertising growth, but it isn’t a major concern yet. It is, however, something that investors should continue to monitor.” data-reactid=”45″>It’s true that Amazon.com has recently started eating into Google’s advertising growth, but it isn’t a major concern yet. It is, however, something that investors should continue to monitor.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Alibaba's chief advantage, on the other hand, is the network effect. The company’s Taobao marketplace connects buyers and sellers at scale. If you want to buy or sell something from your home, Taobao is the place to go. ” data-reactid=”51″>Alibaba’s chief advantage, on the other hand, is the network effect. The company’s Taobao marketplace connects buyers and sellers at scale. If you want to buy or sell something from your home, Taobao is the place to go.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="That advantage, however, is somewhat under threat as rival JD.com has stepped in and offered direct-to-consumer (instead of consumer-to-consumer) options that eliminate the need to worry about product quality. JD also has an extensive fulfillment and delivery network to guarantee fast delivery.” data-reactid=”52″>That advantage, however, is somewhat under threat as rival JD.com has stepped in and offered direct-to-consumer (instead of consumer-to-consumer) options that eliminate the need to worry about product quality. JD also has an extensive fulfillment and delivery network to guarantee fast delivery.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Alibaba has countered by building out its own Cainiao fulfillment network. It also is protected by network effects that came from its payment option (AliPay) and high switching costs from its cloud services.” data-reactid=”53″>Alibaba has countered by building out its own Cainiao fulfillment network. It also is protected by network effects that came from its payment option (AliPay) and high switching costs from its cloud services.
Adding these things together, I’d argue that this would normally be a tie. However, I’ve learned the hard way that investing in China can be riskier than it might seem, and will give Alphabet the slight edge thanks to this.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Winner = Alphabet” data-reactid=”55″>Winner = Alphabet
<h2 class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="And my winner is…” data-reactid=”56″>And my winner is…
So there you have it. While it was a close battle between two fairly valued stocks, Alphabet came out ahead. The company’s balance sheet gives it more flexibility in times of crisis, and — as far as I’m concerned — its global presence outside of China gives it a slightly wider moat.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content=" More From The Motley Fool ” data-reactid=”58″> More From The Motley Fool
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Brian Stoffel owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), and Amazon. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, and JD.com. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.” data-reactid=”66″>John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool’s board of directors. Brian Stoffel owns shares of Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), and Amazon. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A shares), Alphabet (C shares), Amazon, and JD.com. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Add Comment