Russia Moves on Climate Change, While the U.S. Stalls

Today’s Agenda

Americans will have to sacrifice to fight climate change. Trump is at war with the state itself. Stop calling Elizabeth Warren a socialist. Curbing U.S. investment in China would be disastrous. Austria’s Sebastian Kurz should reject the far right.

An Inconvenience Truth 

(Bloomberg Opinion) — If you’re like me, you ignore health problems that aren’t worth the hassle of a doctor visit. Emergencies get medical attention; everything else gets WebMD. Americans are like that with climate change, except the emergency is already here.

Massive storms, wildfires, droughts and more make it clear we have a worsening climate problem. But as Noah Smith points out, we can’t yet be bothered to truly do anything about it. One straightforward tool for curbing carbon emissions is taxing them a bit more, for example. But we vote that down whenever it’s on the ballot. Keeping warming within tolerable limits will require decades of sacrifice and upheaval far beyond a little tax. The sooner we accept that, the sooner we can solve our problem.

Things may be changing at the margins. The collapse of travel agency Thomas Cook may herald the decline of the kind of the pre-packaged tourist experience it invented, writes Leonid Bershidsky. A spreading woke-ness about authentic experiences is part of this, but so is guilt over the environmental impact of living like a pasha everywhere you go.

The cruise industry is a small but exemplary part of this travel-industrial complex. It has a massive negative environmental impact, Adam Minter writes, and consumers and governments are noticing. But the cruise industry is about as slow to change course as, um, a very large, ponderous watercraft. 

Vladimir Putin moves a bit faster. Russia has long been a climate ignorer; it even stands to benefit from unfrozen Arctic waterways. But it recently joined the Paris climate accord, and Julian Lee explains one reason why: Thawing permafrost undermines the stability of Russian oil and gas projects. That might make gasoline a bit more expensive, and we can’t have that.

Further Energy Reading: Oil and gas stocks avoided an embarrassing index-name change but can’t avoid harsh reality. – Liam Denning

Impeachorama

President Donald Trump continued to respond to his growing impeachment threat by watching television and tweeting. The latter included increasingly hostile attacks on the whistle-blower and Democrats; today he called for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to be arrested for treason. Such vitriol is a reminder that Trump’s real enemy isn’t some amorphous “Deep State,” but the entire apparatus of state itself, writes James Gibney. If it doesn’t serve him, then it must be destroyed.

So far, Attorney General William Barr has been on the Trump-friendly side of the divide, helping him snuff out his little Mueller Report problem and also swatting down the whistle-blower complaint about Trump’s dealings with Ukraine. In fact, writes Stephen Mihm, the Justice Department has a long history of cronies holding the job. Barr keeps that tradition alive.

Still, Trump’s jeopardy grows the more we learn about what’s on the secret White House server where staffers quarantined his most toxic conversations. Tim O’Brien notes Trump has always hated leaving a paper trail. Now there’s one that includes much more of interest to an impeachment inquiry than just his chat with Ukraine’s president.

Warren’s No Socialist

Wall Street is apparently terrified of an Elizabeth Warren presidency; even Democratic fundraisers would rather keep Trump around another four years than face the horrors of a Warren administration. But she’s getting a bad rap, writes Joe Nocera. Warren favors capitalism over socialism; she just wants it to be more fair. Wall Street hated FDR too, Joe notes, but he restored faith in financial markets by reforming them. Even on health care, she has not exactly been a Medicare for All zealot, writes Max Nisen.

Trump’s Dangerous China Threat

Stocks rebounded today partly on hopes Trump will come to his senses about curbing U.S. investment in China, which would have devastating repercussions, John Authers notes. For one thing, it would  give China incentive to start selling Treasury bonds, writes Shuli Ren. For another, American investors already are woefully underweight China stocks, which will probably outperform U.S. stocks for the foreseeable future, writes Nir Kaissar. And turning financial markets into political weapons would set a terrible precedent for the world.