<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / November 25, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.” data-reactid=”11″>NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / November 25, 2019 / The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that class actions have commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in the following companies. If you suffered a loss you have until the lead plaintiff deadline to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. There will be no obligation or cost to you.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="iRobot Corporation (IRBT)” data-reactid=”12″>iRobot Corporation (IRBT)
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/irobot-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: November 21, 2016 to October 22, 2019″ data-reactid=”13″>If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/irobot-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: December 23, 2019
Class Period: November 21, 2016 to October 22, 2019
The filed complaint alleges that defendants misrepresented the reason for iRobot’s acquisitions of Tokyo-based Sales on Demand Corporation and privately-held Robopolis SAS, which was to control the Company’s largest distributors so that defendants could inflate sales and revenue figures by stuffing the channel. Defendants further misled investors by repeatedly telling them throughout the Class Period that the Company was seeing continued double-digit revenue growth, and by attributing the growth to increased demand for the Roomba vacuums, when in reality defendants were engaging in channel-stuffing to artificially boost sales. Defendants also misstated that the Company’s channel inventory levels had not changed and would not change dramatically from quarter to quarter or year over year, when in fact iRobot was deliberately stuffing the channel in order to claim false revenue growth.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR)” data-reactid=”15″>UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR)
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/up-fintech-holding-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Fintech American Depository Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering conducted on or about March 20, 2019; or (b) Fintech securities between March 20, 2019 and May 16, 2019.” data-reactid=”16″>If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/up-fintech-holding-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 6, 2020
Class Period: all persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Fintech American Depository Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the Company’s initial public offering conducted on or about March 20, 2019; or (b) Fintech securities between March 20, 2019 and May 16, 2019.
Allegations against TIGR include that: (i) Fintech was experiencing a material decrease in commissions because of a negative trend related to risk-averse investors in the market; (ii) Fintech was unable to absorb costs associated with the rapid growth of its business and its status as a publicly listed company on a U.S. exchange; (iii) Fintech was incurring significant additional expenses related to, inter alia, employee headcount and employee compensation and benefits; (iv) all of the foregoing had led to Fintech significantly increasing operating costs and expenses; and (v) as a result, the documents filed by the Company in connection with the initial public offering were materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein, and the Company’s Class Period statements were likewise materially false and/or misleading.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC)” data-reactid=”18″>Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC)
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/canopy-growth-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: June 21, 2019 to November 13, 2019″ data-reactid=”19″>If you suffered a loss, contact us at: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-1/canopy-growth-corporation-loss-submission-form?prid=4586&wire=1
Lead Plaintiff Deadline: January 20, 2020
Class Period: June 21, 2019 to November 13, 2019
Allegations against CGC include that: (1) the Company was experiencing weak demand for its softgel and oil products; (2) as a result, the Company would be forced to take a CA$32.7 million restructuring charge due to poor sales, excessive returns, and excess inventory; and (3) as a result, Defendants’ statements about its business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected] or by telephone at 212.425.1140.” data-reactid=”21″>To learn more contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected] or by telephone at 212.425.1140.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney who has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]” data-reactid=”23″>CONTACT:
Vincent Wong, Esq.
39 East Broadway
Suite 304
New York, NY 10002
Tel. 212.425.1140
Fax. 866.699.3880
E-Mail: [email protected]
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong” data-reactid=”24″>SOURCE: The Law Offices of Vincent Wong
View source version on accesswire.com:
https://www.accesswire.com/567970/SHAREHOLDER-ALERT-IRBT-TIGR-CGC-The-Law-Offices-of-Vincent-Wong-Reminds-Investors-of-Important-Class-Action-Deadlines
Add Comment